Saturday, November 19, 2005
Dance of Digital Curriulum and Teacher Education
This week I received a message from a group of K-12 innovators developing New High Technology High Schools (
I met last week with director of curriculum for a major university’s college of education. He works closely with K-12 digital curriculum enterprises. He lamented that they focused on transforming legacy text based curriculum into digital format instead of using what meager eLearning based pedagogy that exists to create more effective digital curriculum.
Two years ago I interviewed most of the thirty presidents of
I have been conversion for 15 years with Henry Kelly of now president of the Federation of American Scientists (then of the White House Office of Research) (http://www.fas.org/main/content.jsp?formAction=297&contentId=69). His series of analyses starting in 1988 in the defunct Congressional Office of Technology Assessment show that research in the application of technology to the learning process is (now) about $200 million a year while the research in the application of technology to the health care process is about $50 billion a year.
Within the eSATS design we have seven major components:
Teacher and staff education and professional development;
Digital curriculum for each student with integrated formative assessment;
Assessment, accountability, access to instruction, decision support data system;
One broadband Internet computer interface per student in the classroom;
Full onsite technical support – 99% up time;
eLearning Centered Schools funded for student mastering a curriculum year;
Innovation Central to manage the ten year transformational process.
Expect for the first two, all can be readily implemented with customer acceptance, innovative zeal and startup funding. And these two are caught in a three way virtuous circle inherent within any innovation life cycle:
eLearning digital curriculum is just now emerging from an agglomeration of “other” technologies to being developed with rudimentary K-12 student eLearning pedagogy. Pedagogy for education eLearning teachers will always lag the emergence of K-12 student eLearning pedagogy. But the development of student eLearning pedagogy requires field testing in an environment rich in the use of eLearning digital curriculum.
Fortunately the past twenty years has produced digital curriculum for K-12 education that provides a significant academic performance boost (effect factor over 0.45 [i.e. C student starts getting B+’s] -- A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Teaching and Learning With Technology on Student Outcomes, Learning Point Assoc. [NCREL] www.learningpt.org ) when integrated with legacy education.
Full statewide implementation of eSATS will take ten years. As eSATS rolls out 1:1 computing to all
By embracing the virtuous circle with eSATS,
This virtuous cycle will accelerate Arizona K-12 eLearning success and provide a model for the rest of the country. We also become the driver for unleashing the global research community to address eLearning based digital curriculum.
Peter Drucker and eLearning ecology
He liked the label social ecologist well before ecology became a household term. My favor saying from Peter Drucker was “There is nothing more practical in business than a good theory.” He also declared in a Lincoln lecture at ASU in 1982: “Over the history of mankind there have been two long term investments that provide a return far above any other. They are fine art, and education.” He may have been influenced by his passion for Oriental art, but viewing the Antiques Road Show – I tend to think he is right.
Since eSATS is advocating education as its investment vehicle for Arizona, we decided that we also needed a theory. Then last year Greg Hickman, of the Center for the Future of Arizona (now with the Rodell Foundation), presented the theory of Human Ecology of the K-12 student to the Governor’s Council for Innovation and Technology -- Education Subcommittee. We knew we had found a “good theory” that served our eLearning system design with the student-teacher as the nexus and the State of Arizona as the scope.
For you interested in details, the Human Ecology of education addresses the workings of five sub-systems:
• Microsystem—the student’s family, home, school, peer group, church, immediate neighborhood…are all microsystems;
• Mesosystem – is two or more microsystems linked together. The interaction between home and school will reinforce behaviors within both systems;
• Exosystem— delivers indirect but powerful effects as outside forces. These include board of education, parents work conditions, state academic standards, department of education, employer needs…;
• Macrosystem--includes cultural beliefs, values, attitudes, customs, national government, laws – propagated by the cultural memes and structure of society;
• Chronosystem -- the student is influenced by different systems at different times over the years.
So to Peter Drucker’s social ecology lets integrate human ecology and apply civic entrepreneurship as the grand theory to drive the pragmatic adoption of eLearning within Arizona’s K-12 education.
Monday, November 07, 2005
eLearning System for Arizona Teachers and Students
Hi!
This is the first message on our new blog. We have a short description that we are about and and skeleton outline of our design for transforming K-12 education. We look forward to hearing from you.
Cheers
tkraver@qwest.net 602-944-8557(h/o)
Our Elevator Speech:
eSATS is leading the charge to *transform* K-12 Education in
That means a computer on every desk, in every classroom, in every school.
Before we rollout that physical infrastructure, we need to put in place the intellectual infrastructure that will maximize its effectiveness.
eSATS will transform
How about exchanging business cards and make an appointment to meet and discuss?